Talk:Literals/Floating point: Difference between revisions

From Rosetta Code
Content added Content deleted
(Created page with "== Fortran == I'm amazed that there is not a Fortran example for this yet. Since the ISO 1990 (1991?) standard (commonly called Fortran 90), Fortran has had some of the richest l...")
 
(→‎REXX: new section)
Line 1: Line 1:
== Fortran ==
== Fortran ==
I'm amazed that there is not a Fortran example for this yet. Since the ISO 1990 (1991?) standard (commonly called Fortran 90), Fortran has had some of the richest language-based (not library-dependent) floating point support around. ISO 2003 adds specific optional support for IEEE numbers too IIRC. I'll try to put together an example if I can find the time, but I no longer have access to a current Fortran compiler. --[[User:Balrog|Balrog]] 09:19, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
I'm amazed that there is not a Fortran example for this yet. Since the ISO 1990 (1991?) standard (commonly called Fortran 90), Fortran has had some of the richest language-based (not library-dependent) floating point support around. ISO 2003 adds specific optional support for IEEE numbers too IIRC. I'll try to put together an example if I can find the time, but I no longer have access to a current Fortran compiler. --[[User:Balrog|Balrog]] 09:19, 5 March 2011 (UTC)

== REXX ==

not quite?
format(something,,,,0) yields '3'
--[[User:Walterpachl|Walterpachl]] 18:27, 27 August 2012 (UTC)

Revision as of 18:27, 27 August 2012

Fortran

I'm amazed that there is not a Fortran example for this yet. Since the ISO 1990 (1991?) standard (commonly called Fortran 90), Fortran has had some of the richest language-based (not library-dependent) floating point support around. ISO 2003 adds specific optional support for IEEE numbers too IIRC. I'll try to put together an example if I can find the time, but I no longer have access to a current Fortran compiler. --Balrog 09:19, 5 March 2011 (UTC)

REXX

not quite? format(something,,,,0) yields '3' --Walterpachl 18:27, 27 August 2012 (UTC)