Talk:Function definition: Difference between revisions

Talk:Function definition (view source)

152 bytes added , 14 years ago

m

Anonymous user

Revision as of 18:03, 5 February 2010 (view source) rosettacode>Sgeier (→‎Lisp, BASIC) ← Older edit		Latest revision as of 12:56, 6 February 2010 (view source) rosettacode>UnderBot m (moved Talk:Creating a Function to Talk:Function definition)
(4 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 10: And of course, Scheme is ''not'' Lisp, but a separate (but similar) language, which BTW also has several dialects. :: Out of curiosity: what is the distinguishing mark that makes you say that? I.e. what difference is "so big" or "so significant" that you would say "it is a different language" as opposed to "it is a dialect of the same language". I'm asking because I once had a professor that considered C and FORTRAN and similar imperative languages to be mere "algol dialects". [[User:Sgeier\|Sgeier]] 18:03, 5 February 2010 (UTC) Indeed, the example which I wrote (and which, not surprisingly, turns out to be identical to the Common Lisp example) should work in any Lisp. Line 42: :: Perhaps having the code example under Lisp would be appropriate if there was an intra-page link from Common Lisp pointing to it? --[[User:Short Circuit\|Short Circuit]] 20:13, 2 March 2008 (MST) == SNUSP, Falcon == I don't think either of these actually do what the task description asks for...[[User:Sgeier\|Sgeier]] 18:04, 5 February 2010 (UTC)