Talk:Find words which contain the most consonants: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
There's no need to delete versions on Rosetta Code – the first step is to comment on the Discussion page, and the general pattern is to add and preserve, perhaps after discussion, with updates. [[User:Hout|Hout]] ([[User talk:Hout|talk]]) 17:14, 26 July 2022 (UTC) |
There's no need to delete versions on Rosetta Code – the first step is to comment on the Discussion page, and the general pattern is to add and preserve, perhaps after discussion, with updates. [[User:Hout|Hout]] ([[User talk:Hout|talk]]) 17:14, 26 July 2022 (UTC) |
||
: Often tasks are disambiguated by referring to the authors original submission making the disgarding of words with repeated constants correct.--[[User:Nigel Galloway|Nigel Galloway]] ([[User talk:Nigel Galloway|talk]]) 18:15, 26 July 2022 (UTC) |
: Often tasks are disambiguated by referring to the authors original submission making the disgarding of words with repeated constants correct.--[[User:Nigel Galloway|Nigel Galloway]] ([[User talk:Nigel Galloway|talk]]) 18:15, 26 July 2022 (UTC) |
||
:: Indeed, and that's why the final output of that variant excludes words with repeated consonants. |
|||
:: I find the preceding (unfiltered) listing interesting though, and I'm inclined to leave it, while the task formulation remains ambiguous, as a reminder that a bit of reformulation still seems desirable. [[User:Hout|Hout]] ([[User talk:Hout|talk]]) 19:57, 26 July 2022 (UTC) |
Revision as of 19:57, 26 July 2022
but each consonant should appear only once in a word
Currently, the task has a requirement that consonants not be repeated.
This has been implemented in two different ways. (Not repeated during the counting process vs. not repeated at all.) --Rdm (talk) 12:48, 25 July 2022 (UTC)
No need to delete versions on Rosetta Code
I've restored a Python version which had been deleted on the grounds that it made a particular interpretation (in fact two complementary interpretations) of the ambiguous task description.
There's no need to delete versions on Rosetta Code – the first step is to comment on the Discussion page, and the general pattern is to add and preserve, perhaps after discussion, with updates. Hout (talk) 17:14, 26 July 2022 (UTC)
- Often tasks are disambiguated by referring to the authors original submission making the disgarding of words with repeated constants correct.--Nigel Galloway (talk) 18:15, 26 July 2022 (UTC)
- Indeed, and that's why the final output of that variant excludes words with repeated consonants.
- I find the preceding (unfiltered) listing interesting though, and I'm inclined to leave it, while the task formulation remains ambiguous, as a reminder that a bit of reformulation still seems desirable. Hout (talk) 19:57, 26 July 2022 (UTC)