Talk:Factors of an integer: Difference between revisions

From Rosetta Code
Content added Content deleted
(Amazing how everyone copies the same mistake...)
Line 1: Line 1:
Should this be "Basic language learning"? I don't even know.
Should this be "Basic language learning"? I don't even know.
[[User:Oligomous|Oligomous]] 12:10, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
[[User:Oligomous|Oligomous]] 12:10, 15 August 2009 (UTC)



This is a bit too similar to [[Prime decomposition]] for my taste. --[[User:IanOsgood|IanOsgood]] 15:48, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
This is a bit too similar to [[Prime decomposition]] for my taste. --[[User:IanOsgood|IanOsgood]] 15:48, 15 August 2009 (UTC)

The Clojure, Python, Ruby and Tcl examples are all wrong; they omit the number itself which is always a factor (just as 1 is). Oops! --[[User:Dkf|Donal Fellows]] <small>(not logging in on this computer; don't own it...)</small>

Revision as of 22:35, 15 August 2009

Should this be "Basic language learning"? I don't even know. Oligomous 12:10, 15 August 2009 (UTC)

This is a bit too similar to Prime decomposition for my taste. --IanOsgood 15:48, 15 August 2009 (UTC)

The Clojure, Python, Ruby and Tcl examples are all wrong; they omit the number itself which is always a factor (just as 1 is). Oops! --Donal Fellows (not logging in on this computer; don't own it...)