Talk:Factors of an integer: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
(Amazing how everyone copies the same mistake...) |
(Not wrong as such. task needs clarification.) |
||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
This is a bit too similar to [[Prime decomposition]] for my taste. --[[User:IanOsgood|IanOsgood]] 15:48, 15 August 2009 (UTC) |
This is a bit too similar to [[Prime decomposition]] for my taste. --[[User:IanOsgood|IanOsgood]] 15:48, 15 August 2009 (UTC) |
||
The Clojure, Python, Ruby and Tcl examples are all wrong; they omit the number itself which is always a factor (just as 1 is). Oops! --[[User:Dkf|Donal Fellows]] <small>(not logging in on this computer; don't own it...)</small> |
The Clojure, <strike>Python</strike>, Ruby and Tcl examples are all wrong; they omit the number itself which is always a factor (just as 1 is). Oops! --[[User:Dkf|Donal Fellows]] <small>(not logging in on this computer; don't own it...)</small> |
||
:No they are not wrong as such, the task description is very woolly. Do we mean integer factors? What about negative factors? Do we include zero? |
|||
:The task specification needs to be tightened up, so following what was given would most likely fit what was envisaged, but I should have flaagged for clarification. --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] 03:19, 16 August 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 03:19, 16 August 2009
Should this be "Basic language learning"? I don't even know. Oligomous 12:10, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
This is a bit too similar to Prime decomposition for my taste. --IanOsgood 15:48, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
The Clojure, Python, Ruby and Tcl examples are all wrong; they omit the number itself which is always a factor (just as 1 is). Oops! --Donal Fellows (not logging in on this computer; don't own it...)
- No they are not wrong as such, the task description is very woolly. Do we mean integer factors? What about negative factors? Do we include zero?
- The task specification needs to be tightened up, so following what was given would most likely fit what was envisaged, but I should have flaagged for clarification. --Paddy3118 03:19, 16 August 2009 (UTC)