Anonymous user
Talk:Exponentiation with infix operators in (or operating on) the base: Difference between revisions
Talk:Exponentiation with infix operators in (or operating on) the base (view source)
Revision as of 17:23, 3 November 2020
, 3 years ago→Title too confused and long: new title discussion.
Thundergnat (talk | contribs) (→what should non infix languages do?: examples?) |
(→Title too confused and long: new title discussion.) |
||
Line 10:
:::: I think that would be a good idea. But that other task didn't address this issue directly except by fiat --- as opposed to what any particular computer programming actually did (not withstanding the ''talk'' page), so I added this task as I very reluctant to change (or modify or add to) an existing and established nine year old task. -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger|talk]]) 15:37, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
:Hi Gérard, how about "Exponentiation parsing" or "Infix parsed exponentiation" or some such as a re-title? Up to now I've not really been aware of the issue, so I'm learning stuff. --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] ([[User talk:Paddy3118|talk]]) 17:22, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
==what should non infix languages do? ==
| |||