Anonymous user
Talk:Exponentiation with infix operators in (or operating on) the base: Difference between revisions
Talk:Exponentiation with infix operators in (or operating on) the base (view source)
Revision as of 15:37, 3 November 2020
, 3 years ago→Title too confused and long: added some wording.
m (→Title too confused and long: changed one word.) |
m (→Title too confused and long: added some wording.) |
||
Line 8:
:::Should a ref be added to [http://www.rosettacode.org/mw/index.php?title=Talk:Parsing/RPN_to_infix_conversion&action=edit§ion=5]? Or should that task actually address the problem?--[[User:Nigel Galloway|Nigel Galloway]] ([[User talk:Nigel Galloway|talk]]) 15:01, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
:::: I think that would be a good idea. But that other task didn't address this issue directly except by fiat --- as opposed to what any particular computer programming actually did (not withstanding the ''talk'' page), so I added this task as I very reluctant to change (or modify or add to) an existing and established nine year old task. -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger|talk]]) 15:37, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
==what should non infix languages do? ==
| |||