Anonymous user
Talk:Enumerations: Difference between revisions
→J concerns: response
(J concerns) |
(→J concerns: response) |
||
Line 2:
I'm not sure how having a header template and an omit template for the same language on one page will behave. If we find a way to do counts of omitted tasks and completed tasks later, this may screw things up, but for now I guess it's OK (especially since the explanation is a bit more than the usual HTML comment). --[[User:Mwn3d|Mwn3d]] 13:25, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
::Oh, I just assumed this was the "proper" way to omit a task. Use the omit template, but include a brief explanation of why the task isn't suited to the language -- I think this gives nearly as much useful information about the language as a "solved" task. Not that I have any say in the matter, but I recommend that the ImplSearchBot gives "omit" priority over "header", such that if both are present, the language is counted as omitted. --[[User:DanBron|DanBron]] 14:06, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
| |||