Talk:DNS query: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
(→Task definition: Records and RR types.) |
(Differentiate between IP4 and IPV6) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Is this task just about address lookups, or are we to look up more information besides? For example, MX records (which I note <tt>www.kame.net</tt> doesn't have…) –[[User:Dkf|Donal Fellows]] 12:21, 17 May 2011 (UTC) |
Is this task just about address lookups, or are we to look up more information besides? For example, MX records (which I note <tt>www.kame.net</tt> doesn't have…) –[[User:Dkf|Donal Fellows]] 12:21, 17 May 2011 (UTC) |
||
: Additional record types would certainly be interesting. I can see about adding each of A, AAAA, MX and SRV records to rosettacode.org. (A and MX should already be there. SRV is the next one likely to be implemented, as i get SIP set up. AAAA is going to require me to do a bit more setup wrt IPv6, and thus probably won't happen for a couple weeks, at least. --[[User:Short Circuit|Michael Mol]] 15:11, 17 May 2011 (UTC) |
: Additional record types would certainly be interesting. I can see about adding each of A, AAAA, MX and SRV records to rosettacode.org. (A and MX should already be there. SRV is the next one likely to be implemented, as i get SIP set up. AAAA is going to require me to do a bit more setup wrt IPv6, and thus probably won't happen for a couple weeks, at least. --[[User:Short Circuit|Michael Mol]] 15:11, 17 May 2011 (UTC) |
||
== Differentiate between IP4 and IPV6 == |
|||
Would it be better to split the IP4 and IPV6 into separate tasks here? Or maybe require the code sections to be suitably commented so that we can see which sections of code apply to each of the protocols. |
|||
[[User:Markhobley|Markhobley]] 20:50, 17 May 2011 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 20:50, 17 May 2011
Task definition
Is this task just about address lookups, or are we to look up more information besides? For example, MX records (which I note www.kame.net doesn't have…) –Donal Fellows 12:21, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
- Additional record types would certainly be interesting. I can see about adding each of A, AAAA, MX and SRV records to rosettacode.org. (A and MX should already be there. SRV is the next one likely to be implemented, as i get SIP set up. AAAA is going to require me to do a bit more setup wrt IPv6, and thus probably won't happen for a couple weeks, at least. --Michael Mol 15:11, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
Differentiate between IP4 and IPV6
Would it be better to split the IP4 and IPV6 into separate tasks here? Or maybe require the code sections to be suitably commented so that we can see which sections of code apply to each of the protocols.
Markhobley 20:50, 17 May 2011 (UTC)