Talk:Box the compass: Difference between revisions
clarify a potential ambiguity
(clarify a potential ambiguity) |
|||
Line 31:
For these reasons, I am inclined to stick an incomplete tag on the J example and require it to produce what was asked for; or add to their current entry another version that does strictly what was asked for. Would this be OK Rdm? --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] 15:54, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
:I think I understand your concerns, but I do not think that these are currently task requirements (I do not see anything in the task requirements specifying that the 33 numbers be isolated from other numbers -- the description does not use words or phrases like "only" or "limited to" or anything like that). Marking the J approach "incomplete", with the current task description, would be analogous to marking down a task for including extra examples. Of course, if you feel it's necessary to change the task description, I will go along with that. However, for now, I am going to add some additional examples for J to show how it works, and hopefully to prevent people from getting the wrong idea. --[[User:Rdm|Rdm]] 16:02, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
::Hi Rdm, the task has the note on computing the index and headings to convert that isn't in your current example but is in others. --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] 19:48, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
| |||