Revision as of 11:47, 25 February 2022 (view source) PureFox (talk \| contribs) (→‎Omitted algorithm: Further comment.) ← Older edit		Revision as of 15:52, 25 February 2022 (view source) Rdm (talk \| contribs) mNo edit summary Newer edit →
Line 4: :Well, if it's considered ''good'' practice to indulge in lengthy and needless repetition from a non-ephemeral source with full past history, then I'm guilty as charged but unrepentant. --[[User:PureFox\|PureFox]] ([[User talk:PureFox\|talk]]) 10:19, 25 February 2022 (UTC) :: If it's lengthy, it's fine to create a secondary page -- for example, perhaps [[Verhoeff algorithm/Length Description]] with that content. As for why this is good practice: ::# as world events are showing us, bad things do happen, and ::# clear and concise descriptions are valuable :: --[[User:Rdm\|Rdm]] ([[User talk:Rdm\|talk]]) 15:51, 25 February 2022 (UTC) ::"lengthy and needless repetition..." I resemble that remark. I usually try to err on the side of too much information rather than not enough. Not 100% of the time but pretty darn often. --[[User:Thundergnat\|Thundergnat]] ([[User talk:Thundergnat\|talk]]) 11:21, 25 February 2022 (UTC)

Talk:Verhoeff algorithm (view source)