Rosetta Code talk:Copyrights: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
(It is.) |
(indemnity clause?) |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
Don't you think this page should be protected too? --[[User:Mwn3d|Mwn3d]] 10:48, 19 December 2007 (MST) |
Don't you think this page should be protected too? --[[User:Mwn3d|Mwn3d]] 10:48, 19 December 2007 (MST) |
||
:It is...This talk page isn't, though. |
:It is...This talk page isn't, though. |
||
Should there be a "not suitable for any purpose; use at own risk" clause, considering the wide range of programming abilities represented here? There is not even any guarantee that examples here been compiled, run or tested. --[[User:IanOsgood|IanOsgood]] 14:59, 8 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 14:59, 8 May 2009
Perhaps you should consider a license for this project such as Creative Commons or GPL3.
Just a thought. SiliconJesus
- Yeah. That'll be one of the things to do before we get out of beta. --Short Circuit 00:22, 9 January 2007 (PST)
Don't you think this page should be protected too? --Mwn3d 10:48, 19 December 2007 (MST)
- It is...This talk page isn't, though.
Should there be a "not suitable for any purpose; use at own risk" clause, considering the wide range of programming abilities represented here? There is not even any guarantee that examples here been compiled, run or tested. --IanOsgood 14:59, 8 May 2009 (UTC)