J/HouseStyle: Difference between revisions
→{{header|J}}: like the suggested format
(→{{header|J}}: response to RDM) |
(→{{header|J}}: like the suggested format) |
||
Line 110:
::: In re your priorities: Working code is absolutely mandatory; one should not "save page" if the solution does not correctly implement the task as described (and perhaps as clarified by other implementations). Simplicity and ease of description are well intentioned goals but problematic in the context of J on RC (outside the general problem of subjectivity).
::--[[User:DanBron|DanBron]] 19:20, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
: I like the outline for J solutions described above. A significant number of solutions follow this format already. Should there be guidelines for formatting code too?--[[User:Tikkanz|Tikkanz]] 21:29, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
| |||