J/HouseStyle: Difference between revisions

thanks & response
(thanks & response)
Line 21:
http://rosettacode.org/wiki/User_talk:Dkf#Your_discussion_about_J
in that more detailed comments and algorithm explanations are required for every code example in the RC forum, since the whole point is to help readers unfamiliar with that specific language understand what is going on in the code. The more unconventional a language is, the more explanation required. Hence, J examples in RC should display good coding practices (for J) in the example, but that code example should also be accompanied with thorough explanations and comments, all of which should be more thorough than if the audience was just J programmers. For that matter, this advice should be applied for all RC code examples. Teledon 8:47am 13 October 2009
 
----
Thanks to to both of you. I'm going to write up my own views in the next couple of days, and start recommending specific guidlines. Feel free to change them and push them in any direction you see fit. If I get time, I'll try to collect here the views that others expressed in the [http://www.jsoftware.com/pipermail/programming/2009-October/016537.html corresponding J forum thread].
 
--[[User:DanBron|DanBron]] 16:55, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
Anonymous user