Category talk:Go: Difference between revisions

From Rosetta Code
Content added Content deleted
(Created page with ""New." Official public launch was November 10, 2009. As of 2011, substantial changes to the base language are infrequent, but there is a new release with bug fixes and library ...")
 
(Can you be a curator?)
Line 1: Line 1:
==Language versioning and updates==
"New." Official public launch was November 10, 2009. As of 2011, substantial changes to the base language are infrequent, but there is a new release with bug fixes and library enhancements every week typically. Releases are assigned no version number other than a date, so the language must certainly still be considered a work in progress. It is likely that some RC task solutions will need to be updated at some point due to language changes. —[[User:Sonia|Sonia]] 07:50, 17 January 2011 (UTC)
Official public launch was November 10, 2009. As of 2011, substantial changes to the base language are infrequent, but there is a new release with bug fixes and library enhancements every week typically. Releases are assigned no version number other than a date, so the language must certainly still be considered a work in progress. It is likely that some RC task solutions will need to be updated at some point due to language changes. —[[User:Sonia|Sonia]] 07:50, 17 January 2011 (UTC)
: Since you're more knowledgable about the language than I am (much more!) I suggest you curate its solutions; it shouldn't be too much work as yet. You may find the optional version parameter to {{tmpl|works with}} to be useful; it lets you tag in what specific releases are known to work. –[[User:Dkf|Donal Fellows]] 09:29, 17 January 2011 (UTC)

Revision as of 09:29, 17 January 2011

Language versioning and updates

Official public launch was November 10, 2009. As of 2011, substantial changes to the base language are infrequent, but there is a new release with bug fixes and library enhancements every week typically. Releases are assigned no version number other than a date, so the language must certainly still be considered a work in progress. It is likely that some RC task solutions will need to be updated at some point due to language changes. —Sonia 07:50, 17 January 2011 (UTC)

Since you're more knowledgable about the language than I am (much more!) I suggest you curate its solutions; it shouldn't be too much work as yet. You may find the optional version parameter to {{works with}} to be useful; it lets you tag in what specific releases are known to work. –Donal Fellows 09:29, 17 January 2011 (UTC)