Category:J: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
m (grammar change (verb tense)) |
(add a little more orientation) |
||
| Line 59: | Line 59: | ||
By themselves, these experiments mean nothing, but if you know that +/ was finding the sum of a list and # was finding the length of a list and that % was dividing the two quantities (and looks almost like one of the classical division symbols) then these experiments might help confirm that you have understood things properly. |
By themselves, these experiments mean nothing, but if you know that +/ was finding the sum of a list and # was finding the length of a list and that % was dividing the two quantities (and looks almost like one of the classical division symbols) then these experiments might help confirm that you have understood things properly. |
||
If you wish to use J you will also have to learn a few grammatical rules (J's parser has [http://www.jsoftware.com/help/dictionary/dicte.htm 9 reduction rules] and "shift" and "accept" - the above examples use four of those rules). J verbs have two definitions - a single argument "monadic" definition and a two argument "dyadic" definition. These terms are borrowed from music and are distinct from Haskell's use of the word "monad". The dyadic definitions are in some sense related to LISP's "cons cell" but are implemented as grammar rather than data structure, and are a pervasive part of the language. |
|||
== J on RosettaCode == |
== J on RosettaCode == |
||