User talk:Walterpachl: Difference between revisions

(thanks)
Line 31:
 
::: Thank you, I was going to ask GS to do that. Can you voice your opinion about the worthiness of (restricted) simpler solutions? --[[User:Walterpachl|Walterpachl]] ([[User talk:Walterpachl|talk]]) 10:13, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
 
:::: Just my opinion: if there is an answer there already that gets flagged as being incomplete and then a complete answer comes along that is longer, more complex, and fails to showcase the language then you might argue to append the wrong answer with an explanation of what it misses out and why it should be kept. But we '''really''' try and stick to the task description so a reason for keeping should be strong.
:::: An example if this is where [[Talk:Range_extraction#TUSCRIPT_example|I asked for an example to be preserved]] in the Range Expansion task as a language had a large part of the spec in-built. They seem to have kept both examples which is great, but I can't think of another example off-hand. --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] ([[User talk:Paddy3118|talk]]) 10:35, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
Anonymous user