Anonymous user
User talk:Nigel Galloway: Difference between revisions
→Special_Ordered_Sets_of_Type_N: Candidate for deletion?
(→Special_Ordered_Sets_of_Type_N: Candidate for deletion?) |
|||
Line 42:
:Thanks for the interest. The manual tr was put in by Paddy3118 so I take no credit for it and I am more than happy to make the change. Spoon! then changed it to use a set in immitation of the Python. I wasn't happy about that!, walking sorted files seemed good to me. C has since implemented that to perfection. The each seems more natural to me, in the real world I would probably want to write these pairs to a file or something, but for the purpose of this example why not?--[[User:Nigel Galloway|Nigel Galloway]] ([[User talk:Nigel Galloway|talk]]) 12:09, 17 May 2013 (UTC)
==[[Talk:Special_Ordered_Sets_of_Type_N#Candidate for deletion?]]==
Hi, just to make you aware .... --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] ([[User talk:Paddy3118|talk]]) 04:38, 7 July 2013 (UTC)
| |||