User talk:Nigel Galloway: Difference between revisions

Line 21:
Hi, unless Ledrug specifically asked for the data, it seems impolite to dump so much on his page and I would urge you to remove it as it can only cause offense. --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] 13:01, 27 October 2012 (UTC)
: That's Nigel Galloway being Nigel Galloway. The content was from [[Talk:Kaprekar numbers]], which he somehow felt very strongly the urge to remove, probably because I said something not very flattering to him there. I undid that change because deleting 30k+ talk without even a word of explanation was basically vandalism, so he decided that those should go on my talk page instead (and of course it was removed from the original place again). Come to think of it, I kinda suspect this paragraph won't survive very long, either. --[[User:Ledrug|Ledrug]] 13:47, 27 October 2012 (UTC)
 
Hi Nigel, it's the 'net. People are wrong/right and rarely polite all the time, but that doesn't mean that one can't try and carve out a good community project and get something done through the noise. How about taking a deep breath and just letting it go? You could move on to your next RC contribution and get something else done. There is rarely any material victory ''or'' loss to the people having the dispute but it can leave people too focused on the argument to the detriment of the 'feel' and reputation of the community. --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] 16:19, 27 October 2012 (UTC)
Anonymous user