Anonymous user
User talk:Dkf: Difference between revisions
→Icon and Unicon coalesce: Alas…
(→Inspirations from {{tmpl|tcllib}}: note on unicon and icon colaesce) |
(→Icon and Unicon coalesce: Alas…) |
||
Line 160:
Some pages for your perusal: {{tmpl|uses from}}, {{tmpl|Library/Body}}, {{tmpl|component}}, {{tmpl|component/Body}},[[Library/Qt]], [[Library/Qt/QApplication]]. Does the arrangement handle your thirst for semantic browsing? (I still hope to get versioning info in there eventually, but it's not a particularly high priority.) (Also, I've noticed some weirdness with stale query results, but recommitting and/or refreshing relevant templates seems to fix it.) --[[User:Short Circuit|Michael Mol]] 04:02, 20 November 2010 (UTC)
== Icon and Unicon coalesce ==
Line 167 ⟶ 166:
It may only have been the one, but if you know of others please let me know. They'll get cleaned up when I retrofit all of this. --[[User:Dgamey|Dgamey]] 16:50, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
: Alas, there's quite a few places where I've done it, far more than I stand any chance of remembering. (You'll have to go through and check all the tasks implemented by Icon. Sorry. Can't be more than a few hundred… :-)) However, I'd encourage working on example showing the ''difference'' between Icon and Unicon; my impression has been of a lot of noise (by comparison with neat use of the {{tmpl|works with}} template) and no distinctiveness. Is Unicon an implementation or dialect of Icon? (If it's the latter, we might need to reconsider how RC handles dialects; up to now, it's been usual to treat them as implementations, but that's not exactly correct when there's only a partial distinction between the language and the implementation of that language, which is all too common. That'd be something for the Village Pump…) –[[User:Dkf|Donal Fellows]] 18:03, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
| |||