User talk:Dkf: Difference between revisions
→Your discussion about J: Maintenance categories
(→Your discussion about J: Maintenance categories) |
|||
Line 66:
::::: This sounds like a good idea, but how do we find the questions in a timely fashion? Perhaps we should introduce a new category (potentially for each language but of course also for J), for people to use when asking for clarification? [[User:Rdm|Rdm]] 20:28, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
:::::: Like one of these? [[:Category:Maintenance]] ... There are templates that put pages in there, but I don't recall offhand which put pages where. --[[User:Short Circuit|Short Circuit]] 21:34, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
:::: At one time I was in the Texas Instruments camp against the HP Reverse-Polish Notation calculators. Then I learnt all about Reverse-Polish when writing an interpreter and revisited my earlier conclusions on RPN and new that they were rubbish. Later, before I learnt a Lisp-like language I was careful not to reject their claims, and I did learn what made it so good to program in at the time. But now I prefer Python for most things, and am being 'tickled' by Haskell/OCaml/D/Oz. --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] 11:07, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
| |||