Anonymous user
Talk:Tree datastructures: Difference between revisions
→Good idea for a task – a couple of thoughts.: Some answers...
(→Good idea for a task – a couple of thoughts.: Some answers...) |
|||
Line 36:
:Good Q's. I have a cold (streaming eyes), and will get back to you tomorrow? Thanks. --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] ([[User talk:Paddy3118|talk]]) 13:33, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
::Ginger and turmeric are the thing, with hot water in large quantities. [[User:Hout|Hout]] ([[User talk:Hout|talk]]) 13:40, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
:: Appreciated, thanks. --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] ([[User talk:Paddy3118|talk]]) 08:24, 17 October 2019 (UTC)
:On those questions.
:JSON: I didn't want to restrict the task that way, as some could make an equal claim for XML or lisp lists - I thought I'd stay more neutral on that point.
:The outline: There should be one, and only one, blah-de-blah :-) Well actually I loved my rocks/mocks pun too much and just slapped in "golfing" as a bad afterthought. I think it is very useful to have the one tree for all language examples, but I stopped mocking golfing years and years ago - its not for RC, but not for mocking IMHO. I have tried for a late save with a note, but is it too late to ask for all examples to update to use just "trolling"?
==And when comparison has children?==
| |||