Talk:Teacup rim text: Difference between revisions
→Dictionary swap?: What are the qualities of a good dictionary here ?
(→Dictionary swap?: What are the qualities of a good dictionary here ?) |
|||
Line 51:
: For the sake of continuity with the history of RC, I will specify that. Good find. Thank you! [[User:Axtens|Axtens]] ([[User talk:Axtens|talk]]) 01:32, 8 August 2019 (UTC)
: Re 'we seem to use a lot', perhaps worth pausing to consider the goals and qualities ?
:The MIT dictionary proves more rewarding for this exercise (it contains more circular groups). It is also half the size, which makes scripts quicker to iteratively test, and contributes less to atmospheric warming. Now that we are flip-flopping a bit here, I think some will understandably just future-proof themselves by using both, which is fine, but it may be that the MIT dictionary simply has better qualities as a vehicle for testing scripts. [[User:Hout|Hout]] ([[User talk:Hout|talk]]) 08:07, 8 August 2019 (UTC)
| |||