# Talk:Special factorials

From Rosetta Code

### Reverse factorial algorithm[edit]

I took a stab at translating the reverse factorial algorithm used in the Factor entry to Java. It should be almost as efficient as taking the factorial itself.

public static int rf(int n) {

if (n == 1)

return 0; //1 has two answers -- return the lower one

int a = 1;

int b = 1;

while (n > a) {

b++;

a = a * b;

}

if (a == n)

return b;

else return -1; //undefined

}

--Chunes (talk) 17:06, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

- Note that the
*factorial inverse*(or*reverse factorial*) of**unity**has two possible answers:**zero**and**unity**.

- It is normal when searching a series (in this case, the series of factorial products) to use the first match found in the series. -- Gerard Schildberger (talk) 17:37, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

### Why is af(0) 0?[edit]

Is it that 0 is the additive identity the way that factorial of 0 is 1 is the multiplicative identity? If so why should it be the identity anyway?

- I think it's just that the formula literally produces 0 for n = 0.
- First run through, i is 1, this produces -1. Second run through, i is 0, this produces 1 and their sum is 0. --Chunes (talk) 17:36, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

So the math summation notation goes backwards automatically when i > n? This may make a good task -- C will do one iteration and stop, etc. --Wherrera (talk) 21:11, 16 March 2021 (UTC)