Talk:Sparkline in unicode: Difference between revisions

m
no edit summary
(→‎Most of these are buggy: Don' t need all these sub-headers, add attribution, and comment)
mNo edit summary
Line 49:
* jq: one-wide and neglects to check bounds: ▁▃▷►
* Nim: Python translation
* fixed! <s>Perl</s>: ▁▁▇█
* fixed! <s>Perl 6</s>: ▁▁▇█
* PicoLisp: ▁▂▅▅▇█
* Python: ▁▁▇█
Line 61:
:--[[User:Oopsiedaisy|Oopsiedaisy]] ([[User talk:Oopsiedaisy|talk]]) 08:24, 24 February 2019 (UTC)
 
:Good point. Fixed in the Perl 6 example (and another bug I found while I was at it.) This highlights the perils of developing without a decent test suitsuite. On the other hand, Rosettacode makes no claims about the quality of the code on the site. --[[User:Thundergnat|Thundergnat]] ([[User talk:Thundergnat|talk]]) 14:42, 24 February 2019 (UTC)
 
:It's the nature of the beast that an early bug may be faithfully translated many times. I agree that a buggy solution has value despite its flaws. I fixed the Perl example. --[[User:Oopsiedaisy|Oopsiedaisy]] ([[User talk:Oopsiedaisy|talk]]) 15:19, 24 February 2019 (UTC)
 
==Bar choices==