Talk:Sequence: nth number with exactly n divisors: Difference between revisions
Talk:Sequence: nth number with exactly n divisors (view source)
Revision as of 10:00, 12 April 2019
, 5 years agotrue, but not the point I was making.
m (corrected text for plurals, added a hint that encompasses all odd terms.) |
Thundergnat (talk | contribs) m (true, but not the point I was making.) |
||
Line 14:
: ''All'' odd terms are '''always''' a square number. -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger|talk]]) 01:02, 12 April 2019 (UTC)
:: You are 100% correct, but these were meant to be optimization hints, not statements of general fact. Sort of an either / or kind of thing. --[[User:Thundergnat|Thundergnat]] ([[User talk:Thundergnat|talk]]) 09:59, 12 April 2019 (UTC)
: That is one <strike>hel</strike> heck of some dandy hints!! -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger|talk]]) 18:56, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
| |||