Anonymous user
Talk:S-expressions: Difference between revisions
m
→How about concentrating on the example?: indent
(→How about concentrating on the example?: Too much removed.) |
m (→How about concentrating on the example?: indent) |
||
Line 171:
::There has been too much of the Python taken out I think. The intermediate language specific list structure should have been left in but instead of saying it was Python, just say enough so that implementers knew to use their languages native ints, floats, strings and nestable lists. (They might have to create a linked list data-structure if their language or a library does not produce one).
::Also removed is the notion of taking the S-expression through to the internal representation, then back to an S-expression of the original which I thought was good too. --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] 07:08, 20 October 2011 (UTC)
| |||