Talk:Rosetta Code/Run examples: Difference between revisions
m
→Task status
m (→Task status) |
m (→Task status) |
||
Line 44:
Of course, this task should not come out of draft status until these ages old questions are addressed/task modified etc. RC entries are supposed to be comparable and ''not'' constrained to be automatically runnable. Languages with read-eval-print-loops might show output from that environment with prompts for example, (or not). - to add another question to the list. --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] ([[User talk:Paddy3118|talk]]) 18:59, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
:Perhaps target-able entries should need to be marked somehow, eg <nowiki>{{libheader|runnable|0.8.1}}</nowiki>, which currently appears as
:{{libheader|runnable|0.8.1}} and (only) then we can assume the next <nowiki><lang>..</lang></nowiki> is a valid stand-alone? A <nowiki>{{libheader|runnable|none}}</nowiki> could serve as an explicit do not run warning.
:It might be sensible to make a local cache part of the task, so it does not re-download files less than (say) 7 days old.
:I might also suggest a decent [x-plat] gui front-end and a common .ini file that all languages can share. --[[User:Petelomax|Pete Lomax]] ([[User talk:Petelomax|talk]]) 08:33, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
| |||