Anonymous user
Talk:Range extraction: Difference between revisions
→Comment in Ada solution on notstion
(→Inverse of Range expansion task?: Standardize on the range format.) |
|||
Line 52:
:Unfortunately I didn't think of a good example to start off as I did not complete both tasks before creating the task pages, hence the different examples. I think it might be too late now to change? --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] 07:53, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
==Comment in Ada solution on notstion==
:''"For real-life applications it is better to use the notation -9..-4"''
True. if I were doing this for real then I would have liked to use a different range indication character, but, as in so many things, I modified/simplified an [http://www-cecpv.u-strasbg.fr/Documentations/lsf/html/lsf6.1_admin/G_jobarrays.html#32777 existing format that used dashes], to allow negative numbers - hence the compromise. (On seeing how easy it was to parse I left it in).
| |||