Talk:Range extraction: Difference between revisions

← Older edit

Talk:Range extraction (view source)

Revision as of 21:03, 6 August 2019

705 bytes added , 4 years ago

m

fixed typo.

Anonymous user

rosettacode>Gerard Schildberger

Revision as of 19:38, 18 April 2013 (view source) rosettacode>Gerard Schildberger m (→‎Inverse of Range expansion task?: added that some programs fail with different ranges. -- ~~~~) ← Older edit		Latest revision as of 21:03, 6 August 2019 (view source) rosettacode>Gerard Schildberger m (fixed typo.)
(6 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: == Might I suggest ...== Might I suggest breaking the format description out to a separate page and transcluding it both here and in [[Range expansion]]? --[[User:Short Circuit\|Michael Mol]] 00:17, 16 July 2010 (UTC) Line 57 ⟶ 58: ==Comment in Ada solution on notation== :''"For real-life applications it is better to use the notation -9..-4"'' True. if I were doing this for real then I would have liked to use a different range indication character, but, as in so many things, I modified/simplified an [http://www~~-cecpv~~.~~u-strasbg~~ccs.frmiami.edu/~~Documentations~~hpc/lsf/~~html/lsf6~~7.~~1_admin~~0.6/admin/~~G_jobarrays~~jobarrays.html#~~32777~~wp1004400 existing format that used dashes], to allow negative numbers - hence the compromise. (On seeing how easy it was to parse I left it in). ==TUSCRIPT example== Line 73 ⟶ 74: Of course, primes   '''2'''   and   '''3'''   would be a special case. -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger\|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger\|talk]]) 19:33, 18 April 2013 (UTC) :With the requisite commas added of course :-)<br>--[[User:Paddy3118\|Paddy3118]] ([[User talk:Paddy3118\|talk]]) 05:56, 19 April 2013 (UTC) I was thinking that the commas would make the gaps (indicating primes) less visible: : 4,6,8-10,12,14-16,18,20-22,24-28,30,32-36,38-40,42,44-46,48-52,54-58,60,62-66,68-70,72,74-78,80-82,84-88,90-96,98-100 -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger\|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger\|talk]]) 16:08, 19 April 2013 (UTC) ::Sorry Gerard I didn't mean for you to go and make the change, I was jokingly making a reference to the rigidity of the spec for the format. --[[User:Paddy3118\|Paddy3118]] ([[User talk:Paddy3118\|talk]]) 16:45, 19 April 2013 (UTC)