Anonymous user
Talk:Pangram checker: Difference between revisions
m
added a section header to the first topic to properly place the table-of-contents (TOC) --- (this happens more often than one would think).
(proposed cleanup of ActionScript solution) |
m (added a section header to the first topic to properly place the table-of-contents (TOC) --- (this happens more often than one would think).) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 1:
== solution for ActionScript? ==
How about this for the same algorithm as the current ActionScript solution, but coded in a saner manner?
Line 18 ⟶ 19:
}</lang>
-- [[User:Markjreed|Markjreed]] 20:05, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
:Since the current implementation admits being barbaric, why not. --[[User:Ledrug|Ledrug]] 20:16, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
==Undiscussed deletion (JavaScript) June 5 2016==
:I notice that a JavaScript example was deleted without discussion on 5 June 2016.
:Addition is generally preferable to deletion, particularly where approaches diverge, but more importantly, proposed deletions do need to be motivated and explained here on the discussion page.
:Unless there are objections, I propose to restore the alternative version, so that readers are allowed see both approaches [[User:Hout|Hout]] ([[User talk:Hout|talk]]) 12:17, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
| |||