Talk:Padovan n-step number sequences: Difference between revisions
Talk:Padovan n-step number sequences (view source)
Revision as of 17:29, 18 March 2021
, 3 years ago→Recurrent and persecutory vandalism
Line 13:
It also aims for a high level of standards compliance, and as always, I have ensured that it is rather more compliant with the standards imposed by the widely used standard Python linters than the complainant's imperative drafts have tended to be.
The serial persecutor and self-appointed arbiter of regimental uniform is clearly less concerned by scrupulous linting than I am, but I have no objection to that. The value of Rosetta code lies in the provision of contrastive insight. They will be able to tell us what values their own drafts aim for, and I look forward to seeing those expressed in an alternative functional Python draft.
I have say that these
That they are motivation by animus is absolutely clear. My strong impression is that the sources of this animus lie elsewhere, and that similar patterns are being played out in home life and work life. If they are to be harnessed here in the form of creative contribution, rather than destructive and persecutory vandalism, then they simply need to flow into additional drafts, rather than into mere attacks and polemics. Minimum adult standards please. Rosetta code deserves that. [[User:Hout|Hout]] ([[User talk:Hout|talk]]) 17:27, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
| |||