Talk:Padovan n-step number sequences: Difference between revisions

← Older edit

Talk:Padovan n-step number sequences (view source)

Revision as of 12:03, 19 March 2021

2 bytes added , 3 years ago

m

→‎Recurrent and persecutory vandalism

Hout

9,655

edits

Revision as of 17:29, 18 March 2021 (view source) Hout (talk \| contribs) (→‎Recurrent and persecutory vandalism) ← Older edit		Latest revision as of 12:03, 19 March 2021 (view source) Hout (talk \| contribs) m (→‎Recurrent and persecutory vandalism)
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 15: The serial persecutor and self-appointed arbiter of regimental uniform is clearly less concerned by scrupulous linting than I am, but I have no objection to that. The value of Rosetta code lies in the provision of contrastive insight. They will be able to tell us what values their own drafts aim for, and I look forward to seeing those expressed in an alternative functional Python draft. I have to say that these outbursts seem to concentrate around Functional Python drafts which happen to possess any qualities which the procedural version lacks – sometimes reliability, sometimes (as here, I think) clarity of expression, sometimes even crude execution speed. That they are ~~motivation~~motivated by animus is absolutely clear. My strong impression is that the sources of this animus lie elsewhere, and that similar patterns are being played out in home life and work life. If they are to be harnessed here in the form of creative contribution, rather than destructive and persecutory vandalism, then they simply need to flow into additional drafts, rather than into mere attacks and polemics. Minimum adult standards please. Rosetta code deserves that. [[User:Hout\|Hout]] ([[User talk:Hout\|talk]]) 17:27, 18 March 2021 (UTC)