Talk:Multisplit: Difference between revisions

→‎Clarification in order: discussion on correct result
(→‎Clarification in order: Swearing/Helping.)
(→‎Clarification in order: discussion on correct result)
Line 70:
: P.S. Anyone can improve task descriptions although it is usually done after, and in conjunction with, debate on the talk pages. --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] 11:25, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
: P.P.S. I have written a few task descriptions myself, and usually on R.C. when someone says they have an issue with it, then they are having an issue. It usually points to people being less familiar with something that the task author thinks everyone should know. Try thinking of other ways to explain things on the talk page to DGamey. Look him up, see what they have contributed in the past to RC. If they have added language implementations, then it usually points to a legitimate misunderstanding on their part and helping them usually leads to a better task description for all. --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] 11:25, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
 
: Vincent, This discussion page is full of talk about which interpretation is correct. Whether "==" parses first or "!=" does. It is throughout the "F# is incorrect" talk as well as ours. DSblizzard authored the task and said "D's interpretation is wrong", Rdm says "D and Java implementations which are incorrect", I've also said so. Mwn3d who has made hundreds of contributions got it wrong from the original description. This is very easy to do especially when the task is in draft and changing. If you based your code on one of the examples that has been shown to be incorrect because you thought the code was clearer than the description, it is understandable and inevitable that you would implement code that would also be wrong. There is no shame in that. You're new to RC having written just a handful of tasks. Wading in on a draft task is risky because the task will often change. It is simply how it works. I'm going to put back the clarification in the task description please don't change it unless you can debate here and convince people besides myself that it needs to be another way. --[[User:Dgamey|Dgamey]] 12:07, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
 
==Small inaccuracy in the smaller non-RE Python version?==
Anonymous user