Talk:Minimum multiple of m where digital sum equals m: Difference between revisions

 
(4 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 173:
 
:I'm trying to decide on an adjective to describe this. I might have to toss a coin to choose between insane and impressive.--[[User:Nigel Galloway|Nigel Galloway]] ([[User talk:Nigel Galloway|talk]]) 13:41, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
::I'm insanely impressed. Chapeau! Kudos to Pete :-) --[[User:Horst.h|Horst.h]] ([[User talk:Horst.h|talk]]) 16:14, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
 
::: FWIW, you may like to consider submitting this to OEIS for inclusion on the [[oeis:A131382|A131382]] page. They only have a list of the first 90 terms at the moment. If you are so inclined. --[[User:Thundergnat|Thundergnat]] ([[User talk:Thundergnat|talk]]) 16:56, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
::: Good idea, done. Update: that page links to [[oeis:A002998|A002998]] which aleady had '''1000''' terms (gulp) and a c++ program... --[[User:Petelomax|Pete Lomax]] ([[User talk:Petelomax|talk]]) 15:59, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
::: OK, now I really, really, really am out ''(please, pretty please!)'' --[[User:Petelomax|Pete Lomax]] ([[User talk:Petelomax|talk]]) 17:19, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
7,804

edits