Talk:Law of cosines - triples: Difference between revisions

Removed a red herring (false path) now replaced by list of some gaps
(Some gaps: (8, 15, 13), (16, 30, 26), (24, 45, 39), (32, 60, 52) etc ... up to (4704, 8820, 7644))
(Removed a red herring (false path) now replaced by list of some gaps)
Line 129:
 
I guess the next thing to do is compare Houts dict based solution and look at the differences. [[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] ([[User talk:Paddy3118|talk]])
:: Some particular 60 degree matches which I see in my output but not (I think) in yours include:
: As far as I can see, by writing your output to file, the first 8 values generated by your uneven 60 degree stream are
:: (8, 15, 13), (16, 30, 26), (24, 45, 39), (32, 60, 52) etc ... up to (4704, 8820, 7644) (all of which, as far as I can see match the pattern ((a^2) + (b^2)) - (a * b) == c ^ 2) [[User:Hout|Hout]] ([[User talk:Hout|talk]]) 20:05, 26 September 2018 (UTC)
 
: (3, 7, 8)
:(5, 7, 8)
:(5, 19, 21)
:(6, 14, 16)
:(7, 13, 15)
:(7, 37, 40)
:(9, 21, 24)
:(9, 61, 65)
: The first two of those look familiar, but do the next six match the A2 + B2 - AB = C2 pattern that you are looking for ? [[User:Hout|Hout]] ([[User talk:Hout|talk]]) 19:25, 26 September 2018 (UTC)
:: Yes – I think they do - perhaps the different stages at which we sorting are causing tests to diverge [[User:Hout|Hout]] ([[User talk:Hout|talk]]) 19:38, 26 September 2018 (UTC)
:: Some particular 60 degree matches which I see in my output but not (I think) in yours include:
:: (8, 15, 13), (16, 30, 26), (24, 45, 39), (32, 60, 52) etc ... up to (4704, 8820, 7644) (all of which, as far as I can see match the pattern ((a^2) + (b^2)) - (a * b) == c ^ 2) [[User:Hout|Hout]] ([[User talk:Hout|talk]]) 20:05, 26 September 2018 (UTC)
9,655

edits