Talk:Last letter-first letter: Difference between revisions
→Full List of Names, and Input to Tasks in General
(→Timings: Narratives usually help with that.) |
|||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 67:
::+1 :[[User:Sonia|Sonia]] 21:27, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
===Full List of Names, and Input to Tasks in General===
I have included my list of the 646 names at the bottom of the Racket implementation; it clutters up the implementation (and the page as a whole) in a manner that I feel is undesirable.
Is what I have done good form -- because on the other hand, people can use the code I have submitted, and they can use my list as a basis of their own.
* Can I "attach" the file to the page and refer to it via a link, so it doesn't have to appear?
* Can I put a "fold" in the markup?
* Should I host the file elsewhere?
Also, is there any way to "semantically" tag the list of 70 names in the task (or any of the sample input that is specified for tasks, in general) so they can be automatically scraped by implementations? --[[User:Tim-brown|tim-brown]] ([[User talk:Tim-brown|talk]]) 07:40, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
: Where we have a particularly long entry for a specific language, we often put that entry (or the bulky part of it) on another page. For example, here, you might use Last_letter-first_letter/Racket. And, here, since the full list of names was not a part of the task, I think it makes sense to leave the core entry in place and just move the "extras".
: But this is not the only possibility (for example, in some cases it makes sense to refer to an external site for "going further").
: As for the "raw data" aspect - hypothetically speaking, that should be addressed in the task description (other than that... it's just like any other issue that leads to bulk, so of course if your language context suggests something specific be said about the data you can express that). --[[User:Rdm|Rdm]] ([[User talk:Rdm|talk]]) 12:58, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
== Go "two interpretations of longest" ==
| |||