Talk:Language Comparison Table: Difference between revisions
→Standard BASIC: ok
(→Standard BASIC: Encyclopedia page for advanced discussion?) |
(→Standard BASIC: ok) |
||
Line 140:
The BASIC entry notes that there are ISO and ECMA standards for the language. While this is true, the vast majority of implementations simply ignore the standards; indeed, many compiler writers have chosen instead to "standardize" on some variation of Microsoft BASIC, due to its popularity. Should this be noted somehow in the table itself? -- [[User:Eriksiers|Eriksiers]] 20:04, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
: Create an Encyclopedia page to hold the extended and supporting details and references for that cell? *bemusedly notes that you could directly transclude that page, with <includeonly> and <noinclude> sections.* --[[User:Short Circuit|Michael Mol]] 22:03, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
:: You mean something like "BASIC standards"? Hmm... Lemme think on it, and dig up some links. -- [[User:Eriksiers|Erik Siers]] 21:04, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
| |||