Talk:Language Comparison Table: Difference between revisions
→Standard BASIC: new section
(→Binding with other site features: Bots are fine by me) |
(→Standard BASIC: new section) |
||
Line 135:
:There were talks of a bot a while ago I think. That would be a sort of dirty way to do it. Something more automatic would probably be preferred, but might require extra web-fu. --[[User:Mwn3d|Mwn3d]] 17:22, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
:: Bots are the normal way to do things in MediaWiki, and, in any case, they stand to be a good first step before integrating code in the server software itself; the kinks and such can still be worked out before the execution environment becomes something ''I'm'' responsible for maintaining. :) --[[User:Short Circuit|Michael Mol]] 17:24, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
== Standard BASIC ==
The BASIC entry notes that there are ISO and ECMA standards for the language. While this is true, the vast majority of implementations simply ignore the standards; indeed, many compiler writers have chosen instead to "standardize" on some variation of Microsoft BASIC, due to its popularity. Should this be noted somehow in the table itself? -- [[User:Eriksiers|Eriksiers]] 20:04, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
| |||