Talk:Kaprekar numbers: Difference between revisions
→Common Lisp Implementation
Line 182:
A lot of hot air for somthing that doesn't exist! I did not break the origional solution, I made it solve the task. Obviously in a way that doesn't suit you. In place of personal abuse you might have changed it to suit you and solve the task. Returning it to a version which doesn't solve the task was not helpful. I was going to restore my version and let you change it, but I'll leave it to you to restore and correct if you think it adds anything. I have a much better idea.--[[User:Nigel Galloway|Nigel Galloway]] 10:40, 26 September 2012 (UTC)
:YOUR version is not CORRECT. Anyone can view the history, try the examples above, and see this is true. I left untouched a slower version that solved the 'Extra extra credit' task, which you seem to be obsessed with for some reason. Why you would expect anyone to fix an incorrect, slower, less readable, and less lispy version of your software, when better versions already existed, is way beyond me. --[[User:Lhignight|Larry Hignight]] 01:17, 30 September 2012 (UTC)
Now with +SCARY CAPITALS+! I dont't expect anyone to do anything, it was merely a suggestion that you 'put up or shut up'. I modified your solution so that it worked, with sample output provided. If it didn't work for large numbers (ouside the scope of the task) it is probably because your log algorithms are inaccurate. You changed it back to your solution, which doesn't solve the task. Your situation is that ledrug didn't like your solution and has replaced it with his. If you have nothing to put up on the task page then all this is just hot air. None of your comments and insults have indicated that which you wish me to do about your situation. As I said I have a better idea, which I have placed on the task page.--[[User:Nigel Galloway|Nigel Galloway]] 11:38, 1 October 2012 (UTC)
| |||