Anonymous user
Talk:Image noise: Difference between revisions
→What are we supposed to be doing here?: just leave FPS but dont think too much about it
(→What are we supposed to be doing here?: just leave FPS but dont think too much about it) |
|||
Line 13:
:::I still think the FPS should be rethought; Do you really want to set up the test on one computer; will then install 12 different C-compilers, LabView, etc.? Learning all compiler flags, libraries, etc?
:::For me RC is more about the languages and in this task compiled languages that fits nicely into the CPU’s cache (ex. PureBasic, C++, etc.) will excel, while in a task where we communicate with a web-server and spend ~99.99% of the time waiting all languages will be equal fast. If performance should be a part of RC it should in some way be standardized before so that we have one common way to compare it – bad data is often much worse the no data. --[[User:Jofur|<Jofur>]] 16:56, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
Don't worry about performance comparisons between languages. Put the code for FPS in there so people can see how to do it. Don't use it to say any example is better than another. --[[User:Mwn3d|Mwn3d]] 21:02, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
| |||