Talk:Idiomatically determine all the characters that can be used for symbols: Difference between revisions
Talk:Idiomatically determine all the characters that can be used for symbols (view source)
Revision as of 18:29, 18 September 2014
, 9 years ago→Arbitration?: peace please!
m (→Arbitration?: left-handed compliment comment.) |
Walterpachl (talk | contribs) (→Arbitration?: peace please!) |
||
Line 291:
::::::: Well, that sounds like I wasn't constructive most of the time. I try to be constructive and informative for all my many Classic REXX examples that I have entered. -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger|talk]]) 17:54, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
:::::::: You '''were''' constructive on several occasions (the proleptic calendar and your justified flagging my x+=8 lapse come to mind.)<br>The sad thing is the tons of vague arguments that you are using in this "discussion" that goes really out of bounds.<br>similarly sad is the number of voters we attract.<br>I shall stop arguing now and post programs that are written in that subset of Rexx that is accepted by each and every Rexx I know in the REXX language section. I will never flag your entries when they use $#@, Upper x, or x"; since I was unable to convince you that we were better off without them (the language features, not your programs.).
PS I don't know what a left-handed compliment is! --[[User:Walterpachl|Walterpachl]] ([[User talk:Walterpachl|talk]]) 18:29, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
== entering ooRexx entries in wrong language section ==
| |||