Talk:Idiomatically determine all the characters that can be used for symbols: Difference between revisions

m
→‎Arbitration?: answered the "or what" question.
m (→‎Arbitration?: answered the "or what" question.)
Line 276:
 
:: As for me I do ask for votes and I would be extremely surprised if they would disallow to add programs to the REXX Language section that can be run by all available REXX interpreters, including ooRexx. Is that what you are asking for, or what?--[[User:Walterpachl|Walterpachl]] ([[User talk:Walterpachl|talk]]) 22:38, 17 September 2014 (UTC)
 
::: No, ... I guess it is the "what".   Please carefully re-read my succinct summary (immediately above the separator line).   I have never stated that ooRexx ''is'' a classic REXX interpreter, so I don't include ooRexx as being one of the Classic REXX interpreters, much as you want it to be.   Although ooRexx ''may'' execute some Classic REXX programs, ooRexx output belongs in the ooRexx language section.   I don't believe I can make it more plainer and clearer than that. -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger|talk]]) 22:48, 17 September 2014 (UTC)
 
== entering ooRexx entries in wrong language section ==