Anonymous user
Talk:Generator/Exponential: Difference between revisions
→Name change request: Any more reasons?
(→Name change request: Any more reasons?) |
|||
Line 19:
::--[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] 05:07, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
==Name change request==
: Is this ready to be promoted to task? There are quite a few examples. [[User:MagiMaster|MagiMaster]] 04:53, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
Line 29 ⟶ 30:
:::: As you say, a generator is only one variation. We should maybe include this is the title, so we have forms Generator/A, Generator/B, etc. There are also generators that are not a generator at all in this sense, such as parametric generators and code generators, which all come under the context of computing. I still advise rename. --[[User:Markhobley|Markhobley]] 15:58, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
:::::Hi Markhobley, but Generator in our context is still enough. Which generator has equal prominance in our field that someone might mistake this for? We need to be wary of overlong titles, so please expand on your reasons. Thanks. --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] 20:00, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
::::: Perhaps "sequential generator"? But, yes, "generator" does have [http://www.sz-wholesale.com/uploadFiles/LPG-B%20Generator_802.jpg other meanings] --[[User:Rdm|Rdm]] 16:57, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
| |||