Talk:Functional coverage tree: Difference between revisions
→Data in a more functional form
Line 44:
I did not use the above, but thought I should generate it. --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] ([[User talk:Paddy3118|talk]]) 20:02, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
: The specified weights look like they are meant to be percentages (all=100), but the specification for missing weights seems to be fractional (all=1). I think that this deserves either a bit more explanation (as to why the use of "1" for default weight is correct) or correction. --[[User:Rdm|Rdm]] ([[User talk:Rdm|talk]]) 01:53, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
| |||