Talk:Egyptian division: Difference between revisions
→Perhaps no need to ask for more than one array ?
(→Perhaps no need to ask for more than one array ?: What I was thinking of ...) |
|||
Line 6:
: Two arrays, one table of "pairs" would be fine. I would like a such a semblance of the description to be used to aid in example comparison . Thanks. --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] ([[User talk:Paddy3118|talk]]) 16:24, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
:: Fair enough – it's essentially a hylomorphism [[wiki:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hylomorphism_(computer_science)]], and it seems reasonable / sufficient to ask people not to fuse the building up and the stripping down to the extent that the intermediate data structure is concealed. In the Haskell, JS, and AppleScript versions I've pulled that out and named it 'rows' rather than fusing it out of sight. I hope that seems enough for you :-) [[User:Hout|Hout]] ([[User talk:Hout|talk]]) 19:09, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
| |||