Talk:Dot product: Difference between revisions
→I suggest replacing the 'for the functional fetishists' JavaScript version
Line 74:
::: Not sure about the larger issue, though -- I can see both sides of this and haven't made up my mind. --[[User:Rdm|Rdm]] ([[User talk:Rdm|talk]]) 21:25, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
::::Not sure how that looks – I've adjusted zipWidth to return undefined when array lengths vary (it certainly does simplify the top level of dotProduct), and for the moment I've left the earlier code in place, and just reframed its characterisation. [[User:Hout|Hout]] ([[User talk:Hout|talk]]) 22:08, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
::::(and, just now, swapping in your zipWith - which is much cleaner and more pleasing)
| |||