Anonymous user
Talk:Determine if a string is collapsible: Difference between revisions
Talk:Determine if a string is collapsible (view source)
Revision as of 05:00, 29 November 2019
, 4 years ago→How strict are the requirements?: added a phrase.
m (→How strict are the requirements?: added a word of clarification.) |
m (→How strict are the requirements?: added a phrase.) |
||
Line 10:
: An ''incomplete output'' (flag) template may not have the wording (and color) to convey the message that only ''some'' of the output is missing. -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger|talk]]) 04:42, 29 November 2019 (UTC)
: I'm not exactly sure what the word ''strict'' means in this context. If the entry works correctly, but has no output at all, would that be sufficient grounds to flag the example/entry? Or if only half (or some other fraction) of the output was shown, or another completely set of output (albeit correct). You ask to see '''20''' ''funny-bunny primes'', but I only show '''10'''. (I think those primes hippty-hop around). Or worse yet, the output is somewhere else entirely --- such as a different page on some another website (that also leaves cookies on the viewer's computer ... ugh). As I understand it, it would. But how does one who doesn't know the programming language well enough to know that the computer program works correctly, if all I have to judge its correctness is the output of that program? -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger|talk]]) 04:42, 29 November 2019 (UTC)
: Note that this Rosetta Code task says to use (''at least'') these/those five required examples. It was my intent to not limit whatever examples to be used, but to have a common base of output for comparisons (among the various computer programming language entries). I must admit, I don't know of all the possible templates that are available and/or what is usable for such a purpose, as some templates do more than others --- such as adding an language entry to some category that can be examined later by reviewing a specific category of that computer programming language. The template <big> <nowiki> {{improve}} </nowiki></big> could be used as it comes close to what I intended to express. The template <big> <nowiki> {{output?/beta}} </nowiki></big> is another possibility, but I don't know exactly what that's used for. -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger|talk]]) 04:42, 29 November 2019 (UTC)
| |||