Talk:Continued fraction/Arithmetic/Construct from rational number: Difference between revisions

Line 4:
:: From the links, I'd guess “rational to continued fraction”. I think this task needs some work on naming! “<tt>Continued fraction arithmetic/Construct from rational number</tt>” would be a first guess; opinions? –[[User:Dkf|Donal Fellows]] 09:38, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
::: I would like Continue fraction arithmetic to be renamed “<tt>Arithmetic</tt>” as a child of “<tt>Continued fraction</tt>” so the final result would be “<tt>Continued fraction/Arithmetic/Construct from rational number</tt>”--[[User:Nigel Galloway|Nigel Galloway]] 12:56, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
:::: Not a problem at all. Won't move things until we've agreed exactly what we're going to though; too messy in terms of the redirects left behind… –[[User:Dkf|Donal Fellows]] 14:27, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
 
: BTW, Nigel, please use the internal link style for links within Rosetta Code (and <tt>wp:</tt> links for links into english Wikipedia) as that makes for better SEO. It's a small thing, but it's better for this site. Cheers! –[[User:Dkf|Donal Fellows]] 10:01, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
Anonymous user