Talk:Continued fraction/Arithmetic/Construct from rational number: Difference between revisions
Talk:Continued fraction/Arithmetic/Construct from rational number (view source)
Revision as of 11:30, 1 May 2013
, 11 years ago→Using r2cf as Generator a in Continued fraction
m (moved Talk:Continued fraction/Arithmetic/Continued fraction r2cf(Rational N) to Talk:Continued fraction/Arithmetic/Construct from rational number: General reorganization) |
|||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 8:
: BTW, Nigel, please use the internal link style for links within Rosetta Code (and <tt>wp:</tt> links for links into english Wikipedia) as that makes for better SEO. It's a small thing, but it's better for this site. Cheers! –[[User:Dkf|Donal Fellows]] 10:01, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
:: IAWTC--[[User:Nigel Galloway|Nigel Galloway]] 13:04, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
::: I've done the first parts of the rename. Any suggestion for what to call the other two pages? Perhaps “<tt>Continued fraction/Arithmetic/Monadic operations</tt>” and “<tt>Continued fraction/Arithmetic/Dyadic operations</tt>”? (Justification: one's a CF->CF operator system, and the other is a CFxCF->CF operator system.) But I'm not very attached to those names. –[[User:Dkf|Donal Fellows]] 11:54, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
:::: Gower uses Bivarate solution for arithmatic with two continued fractions. By extension the case with one continued fraction could be Monovarate. --[[User:Nigel Galloway|Nigel Galloway]] ([[User talk:Nigel Galloway|talk]]) 11:30, 1 May 2013 (UTC)
== Titles are messed up ==
| |||